Australia’s surprise late-night passage of legislation that will split the Reserve Bank’s board into two entities may pave the way for it to reveal votes similar to the Federal Reserve, while also raising uncertainty over the future path of interest rates.
Author of the article:
Bloomberg News
Swati Pandey
Published Nov 28, 2024 • 3 minute read
(Bloomberg) — Australia’s surprise late-night passage of legislation that will split the Reserve Bank’s board into two entities may pave the way for it to reveal votes similar to the Federal Reserve, while also raising uncertainty over the future path of interest rates.
Article content
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.
RBA Reforms Raise Uncertainties Over Rate Path, Economists Say Back to video
Article content
“The new monetary policy board is key — who will be on it, who transfers over from the current board, how many new members and their background,” Su-Lin Ong, chief economist at Royal Bank of Canada, said Friday. “It will likely take some time for markets to assess where on the spectrum of dove/hawks the members sit.”
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
- Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
- Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
View more offers
Article content
The legislation follows an independent review of the central bank, which called for wholesale changes to the RBA’s operations, some of which were enacted this year including fewer policy meetings and regular press conferences by Governor Michele Bullock.
The composition of the new monetary policy board, which will take effect following the RBA’s Feb. 17-18 meeting, is still unclear. Bullock, Deputy Andrew Hauser and Treasury Secretary Steven Kennedy will be on the body while the other six external members — who are currently mainly drawn from business and academia — will be appointed by Treasurer Jim Chalmers
It is possible that many of the current external members will move to the new governance board, opening up slots for new appointees to the monetary policy committee. Bullock has previously said that she’s had discussions with current board members to gauge their preference while adding she’d want some “continuity” on both of the new bodies.
Bullock didn’t disclose the preferences of current board members.
“The changes raise the uncertainty around the RBA’s reaction function going forward given potential new board personnel,” economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. wrote in a note to clients.
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The RBA has kept policy on hold since last November, with its benchmark rate at a 13-year high of 4.35%. On Thursday, Bullock reiterated that core inflation is still “too high” to consider rate cuts in the near term. The rhetoric prompted economists at ANZ Bank to push back their call for the start of the RBA’s easing cycle to May, from February previously.
Financial markets see a 1-in-3 chance of a 25-basis-point cut in February with an easing in May fully priced in.
The dual board framework was originally intended to be in place by mid-2024, but differences between the Labor government and center-right opposition over its composition had delayed passage of the bills. Ultimately Chalmers did a deal with minority parties to get his signature reform through parliament.
Subscribe to The Bloomberg Australia Podcast on Apple, Spotify, on YouTube, or wherever you listen.
Once the new structure is in place, Bullock will decide whether to publish unattributed votes from the meeting and have board members deliver speeches.
In explaining the need for a separate policy board, the RBA review in 2023 found the current entity provides only “limited challenge” to the views of top bank officials and that its skillset is “not matched to the complex and uncertain economic environment in which monetary policy will increasingly operate.”
As a result, the review recommended the six external members have diverse economic backgrounds and have direct access to RBA staff. They will work part-time, equivalent to about one day a week.
Under the current structure, the governor is appointed for a seven-year term and the deputy governor for five, and both are eligible for reappointment. Non-executive directors are appointed for terms of five years. Typically, they serve a maximum of two terms.
Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Create an AccountSign in
Join the Conversation
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
Trending
- MortgagesMortgage borrowers will foot the bill for government GST cuts and other rebates
- FP CommentOpinion: Sorry, your life savings are in the mail
- NewsPosthaste: Canada retreats from the edge of the mortgage renewal cliff, TD Bank says
- NewsCanada Post temporarily laying off striking workers, union says
- NewsCanada's economy grew by 1% in the third quarter
Read Next